Tuesday, April 21, 2015
By: Global Information Network (GIN)
In an essay in the British Guardian, David Olusoga wrote: вЂњWhen the media analysts at the Vatican scrutinize the social media traffic of the past seven days, their eyes might well be drawn away from Turkey and the Armenian diaspora towards a cluster of tweets, comments and Facebook posts that emanate from Africa.
вЂњThere, another debate raged last week,вЂќ he said. вЂњThe popeвЂ™s description of the Armenian massacre as вЂњthe first genocide of the 20th centuryвЂќ was simply incorrect. That grim distinction belongs to the genocide that imperial Germany unleashed a decade earlier against the Herero and Nama, two ethnic groups who lived in the former colony of South West Africa, modern Namibia.вЂќ
Olusoga pointed out that the Namibian genocide, 1904-1909, вЂњseemed to prefigure the later horrors of that troubled century.вЂќ The systematic extermination of around 80 percent of the Herero people and 50 percent of the Nama was the work both of German soldiers and colonial administrators; вЂњbanal, desk-bound killers.вЂќ The most reliable figures estimate 90,000 people were killed, he said.
In the case of the Herero, he recalled, вЂњan official, written order вЂ“ the extermination order вЂ“ was issued by the German commander, explicitly condemning the entire people to annihilation. After military attempts to bring this about had been thwarted, the liquidation of the surviving Herero, along with the Nama people, was continued in concentration camps, a term that was used at the time for the archipelago of facilities the Germans built across Namibia.вЂќ
вЂњSome of the victims of the Namibian genocide were transported to those camps in cattle trucks and the bodies of some of the victims were subjected to pseudoscientific racial examinations and dissections.вЂќ
Recollection of this horror comes as a conference on reparations winds up in New York. However, unlike in the U.S. which apologized for slavery by resolutions in the House and Senate a decade ago, вЂњAll of this is now well known and widely accepted in Africa and even in Germany,вЂќ says Olusoga.
вЂњIn 2004, the German government apologized to the Herero and admitted that what Germany had done to their ancestors constituted a genocide,вЂќ he said. вЂњAs the co-author of one of the more recent histories of the genocide, I am regularly invited to attend conferences and give lectures on the subject in Germany and the word is spreading. A decade ago, my co-author and I described what took place in Namibia between 1904 and 1909 as вЂњGermanyвЂ™s forgotten genocideвЂќ. That phrase is now past its sell-by date, everywhere, it seems, other than in the Vatican.вЂќ
Olusoga wondered if the popeвЂ™s statement was made in ignorance or if the Vatican was guilty of the sin of deliberate omission. вЂњCatholicism is growing faster in Africa than anywhere else,вЂќ he observed вЂ“ вЂњ200 million Africans are followers of the faith. But awareness of history is also increasing in Africa and crimes such as the Namibian genocide can no longer be ignored, whether by accident or design.вЂќ
David Olusoga is the co-author, with Casper Erichsen, of The KaiserвЂ™s Holocaust: GermanyвЂ™s Forgotten Genocide and the Colonial Roots of Nazism